Three years ago, Dana DeBeauvoir, a county clerk in Austin, Texas, had a problem. Soon she’d have to replace the aging voting machines her county had bought eight years earlier. Congress had ponied up the money for those machines, driven by the hanging chad debacle in Florida’s 2000 election. But this time, the feds weren’t coughing up any cash.
Even if she had the money, though, she didn’t like her choices. Computer scientists had been sounding alarms about the rampant security flaws in voting machines for years, and the manufacturers hadn’t responded. So DeBeauvoir took a very unusual step: She gave the keynote speech at a computer voting security conference, challenging the assembled computer scientists to build her the voting system of her dreams.
She outlined four requirements. First, the…