The appearance of Paul O’Sullivan before the Ad hoc Committee yesterday presents an important opportunity for Parliament to reaffirm its constitutional responsibility of oversight, accountability, and transparency. Proper interrogation in this context is not an act of persecution, but a necessary exercise of democratic governance.
O’Sullivan has, over many years, positioned himself as a prominent figure in matters relating to corruption, law enforcement, and the criminal justice system. His public interventions, influence, and close engagement with state institutions have given him significant visibility and impact. Where individuals play such a consequential role in shaping public narratives and institutional actions, it is both reasonable and necessary that their conduct, methods, and claims be subjected to rigorous scrutiny.
A thorough interrogation allows the Committee to clarify facts, separate evidence from opinion, and…